Splice

How we interpret dreams

Splice in a dream: what does it mean?

Two pieces of film joined, which is where the meaning of a film is actually made, because nothing in the material says what should follow what.

Browse all symbols

How do the four traditions read it?

Each reading below comes from a named tradition and a cited source, so you can see where it came from and decide what fits your dream. The four often disagree, and that is the point: a symbol rarely means one fixed thing, and the distance between Freud, Jung, modern research and myth tells you more than any single verdict could.

How did Freud read this symbol?

Freud would attend to the join. Two unrelated things placed together are read as connected, and he would ask what the dreamer has assumed follows from what.

After Freud, The Interpretation of Dreams (Brill trans., 1913), public domain.

How did Jung read this symbol?

A Jungian reading might note the strength of the effect. An audience will invent a reason for any two shots in sequence, so the connection is supplied by the watcher and not the film.

Our summary of a Jungian reading, in our own words, not Jung's. See Jung, ed., Man and His Symbols (1964).

What does modern dream research say?

Abrupt changes of scene appear in dream reports, and the neurocognitive account treats such discontinuity as an ordinary feature of dreaming.

Our summary of the neurocognitive account. See Domhoff, The Emergence of Dreaming (2018).

What do myth and folklore say?

The word came from rope and rigging, where two ends are interwoven rather than knotted, and the film sense was borrowed whole from the sea.

Rosmerta Publishing editorial synthesis (after Brewer).

How can writers use this symbol?

The same symbol, read as craft material rather than as a dream. What it does on the page, how genres use it differently, and what happens when you turn it inside out. Written for novelists, screenwriters and poets who need the symbol to actually work, and it ends with something to try.

Where does this appear in literature?

Put any two pictures next to each other and somebody will tell you why the first one caused the second. The film did not say so.

Rosmerta Publishing editorial synthesis. Our own words; no quoted text.

What does it do in a story?

A connection supplied by whoever is watching.

What are the genre conventions?

A strip of tape across two frames, and a join that flickers once.

How to subvert it

Write the splice nobody reads a meaning into.

Try this

Two hundred words about two things put together and a reason supplied.

Only the first of these names a source. What a symbol does in a story, how genres treat it, how to invert it and what to try are our editorial judgement as writers and editors, not findings from a body of research. They are offered as craft opinion and should be argued with.

The books behind these readings

These are the books this entry actually draws on, not a general reading list. Where a text is in the public domain we link the free copy first, because you should not have to pay for something you can read for nothing. Every edition listed has been checked to exist and to be the right one.

  • The Interpretation of Dreams

    Sigmund Freud

    The source behind every Freud reading in the dictionary. This is the 1913 Brill translation we adapt from, and it is free to read online.

  • Man and His Symbols

    Carl Jung

    The accessible Jung, and the honest place to start for the archetype material our Jung readings summarise.

Rosmerta Publishing is a member of the Bookshop.org and Amazon Associates affiliate programs. If you buy a book through these links we may earn a small commission, at no extra cost to you. The public-domain texts are always free to read online.

This is a starting point to think with, not a verdict. Your own associations matter most.

If distressing nightmares keep returning, it can help to talk them over with a doctor or therapist.

Interpretations are adapted in our own words from public-domain sources, including G. H. Miller, Ten Thousand Dreams Interpreted (1901), Freud (Brill translation, 1913), and Artemidorus, with cross-cultural context from Bulfinch and others. Jungian and modern-cognitive entries are original summaries of those ideas. See the bibliography for full sources.

Scroll to Top